Albert Namatjira – copyright and a will

By Arts Law Centre of Australia on 4th May 2012

Albert Namatjira is one of Australia’s most well-known and celebrated Indigenous artists, however his family’s ability to have any legal influence over the ongoing cultural and economic management of his artworks after his death was compromised by the Public Trustee’s failure to appreciate the value and significance of copyright.

In 1957 Namatjira had entered into a legal agreement with publishing company Legend Press, which was owned by John Brackenberg.  This agreement stated that Legend Press would pay royalties to Namatjira in exchange for having the sole right to reproduce all of his paintings. This was not an agreement about buying paintings rather it was a licence of Namatjira’s copyright – the right to put reproductions of his artwork on things such as greeting cards and tea towels and in books. In return for this licence, Namatjira received an ongoing economic benefit through royalties or licence fees. However he still owned his copyright and, in theory, at the end of that licence he could have negotiated a different agreement or sought better fees. Indeed, as the value of his works increased and his reputation grew, it would have made sense to seek improved terms for any copyright licence.

However, two years later, in 1959, Namatijira passed away. His will left his estate including his copyright to his family.  At this time Legend Press still owned the rights to reproduce Namatjira’s work, but continued to pay a 12 percent royalty to his family each year.  The Public Trustee for the Northern Territory Government was responsible for administering the will and his estate. When the agreement concluded in 1983, the Public Trustee decided to sell the copyright to all his works for $8,500 to John Brackenberg.

Under current law, copyright endures for 70 years after an artist’s death.  It is likely that the copyright fees which could have been earned by the family from licences of Namitjira’s work over the next 46 years would have been far in excess of $8,500!  Since his death Namatjira's works have rocketed up in price, selling for up to several hundred thousand dollars today and hence the fees for using his copyright would also have increased dramatically. Sadly, the Public Trustee did not think about that or consult Namatjira’s family after their decision. The Public Trustee did not understand that keeping the copyright would have created financial benefits for the family far greater than the $8500 sale price.

It’s important to understand that copyright can be a very valuable asset and can become even more valuable over time. It’s important that artists don’t give their copyright away during their lifetime and that those responsible for administering their wills and estates understand the potential value that copyright can have.

The story of Albert Namatjira demonstrates that there is much more to be done to adequately protect the legacy of Indigenous artists in Australia.

One way for Indigenous artists to safeguard the copyright in their artworks for their families is to make sure they have a will. Arts Law has a template will for Indigenous artists available on its Artists in the Black website.  This will has been specifically designed to facilitate the management of an artists’ copyright after their death, to help ensure the intended individuals become beneficiaries of the artwork and associated economic benefits. To download the sample will click here.


 

Further resources you might find useful:

Popular case studies

  • 1. Wamod Namok’s “Kangaroo” - Copyright infringement

    In 2005, reproductions of Bardayal Nadjamerrek's "Kangaroo" painting were offered for sale on the internet accompanied by statements that any sales would result in royalties being paid to the artist. Sadly, the reproductions were unauthorised and the artist had never received any royalties.

    View here.

  • 2. Mandy Davis and her “Emu” painting

    Artists in the Black client Mandy Davis, has received a settlement from a company for their infringement of her copyright and her moral rights. The case is a great example of how AITB works.

    View here.

  • 3. Picture perfect - protecting copyright when selling photographs online

    A young up and coming photographer called Arts Law for advice about starting a website to sell her photographs online.

    View here.

  • 4. David Beaumont Case Study – Do I need permission to use this old photo in my work?

    David Beaumont is a Melbourne based visual artist whose works are held in private collections in Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. He is a five time finalist in the ANL Maritime Art Prize and has exhibited in over a dozen solo exhibitions since 1999. In late 2010, he contacted Arts Law regarding an exhibition he was in the process of creating which addressed the controversial and highly emotional theme of terminal illness and euthanasia.

    View here.

  • 5. Yiwarra Kuju: the Canning Stock Route

    In late 2006, the Perth-based non-profit cultural organisation FORM initiated Ngurra Kuju Walyja – One Country, One People — The Canning Stock Route Project. The project began with modest aims to present an Aboriginal history of the Canning Stock Route through art and oral history and establish economic and professional development opportunities in remote communities. The project quickly grew to unexpected proportions. Within a year 110 Aboriginal artists and contributors were involved from 10 art and culture centres across 17 remote communities in the Goldfields, Pilbara and Kimberley, with a team of nine Aboriginal and five non-Aboriginal co-curators, multimedia crew and cultural advisors. The Canning Stock Route collection, which includes around 130 artworks, was defined by the curatorial team over two years and was acquired by the National Museum of Australia in December 2008.

    View here.

  • 6. Rod Nash - A cancelled commission case study

    Rod Nash was shocked when a Sydney council told him to stop work on his sculpture “Seed” which they had commissioned him to make for a public library. Rod contacted Arts Law to find out his rights.

    View here.

  • 7. Breaking up is hard to do … what happens when a band member leaves.

    Arts Law recently advised members of a band on the copyright status of a number of their songs after one of the band members had decided to leave the band

    View here.

  • 8. Carol Langley - Understanding liability when publishing images and interviews.

    Over the course of 2005, then Arts Law lawyer Katherine Giles and one of our pro bono lawyers gave several advices to writer Carol Langley about her book “Beneath the Sequined Surface”.

    View here.

  • 9. Wangka Maya - Copyright issues when reproducing art for posters

    Artists in the Black (AITB) provided legal advice to Wangka Maya, an Aboriginal language organisation in regional Western Australia.

    View here.

  • 10. Respect and Protect Indigenous Art and Culture

    You can help ensure that Indigenous art and culture is respected and protected

    Indigenous Australians’ art and culture is a highly regarded and much publicised feature of Australian society. Commercial operators who deal with Indigenous art, play a key role in ensuring that Indigenous art and culture is respected and appreciated, rather than exploited.

    View here.

Warning: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are warned that this web site may contain images of deceased people.